500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

EAGLE HILL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

369
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

71

16%

LEVEL 3

179

40%

LEVEL 4

190

42%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

394
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

36

7%

LEVEL 2

76

15%

LEVEL 3

163

32%

LEVEL 4

231

46%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

183
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

30

13%

LEVEL 3

88

39%

LEVEL 4

95

43%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

190
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

41

17%

LEVEL 3

79

32%

LEVEL 4

111

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

186
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

41

18%

LEVEL 3

91

40%

LEVEL 4

95

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

204
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

35

13%

LEVEL 3

84

32%

LEVEL 4

120

46%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

64
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

16

23%

LEVEL 4

48

68%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

75
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

16

20%

LEVEL 4

59

72%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

273
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

62

18%

LEVEL 3

145

42%

LEVEL 4

128

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

289
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

31

8%

LEVEL 2

64

17%

LEVEL 3

131

34%

LEVEL 4

158

41%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

8

42%

LEVEL 4

7

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

9

64%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

6

55%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

6

43%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

361
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

60

14%

LEVEL 3

175

41%

LEVEL 4

186

43%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

384
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

22

5%

LEVEL 2

68

14%

LEVEL 3

156

33%

LEVEL 4

228

48%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

11

50%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

14

44%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

7

22%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

347
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

56

14%

LEVEL 3

164

40%

LEVEL 4

183

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

368
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

60

13%

LEVEL 3

147

32%

LEVEL 4

221

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

15

37%

LEVEL 3

15

37%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

16

33%

LEVEL 4

10

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.