500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

EDWARD SMITH K-8 SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

272

64%

LEVEL 2

78

18%

LEVEL 3

56

13%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

229

56%

LEVEL 2

83

20%

LEVEL 3

59

14%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

131

61%

LEVEL 2

44

20%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

108

50%

LEVEL 2

54

25%

LEVEL 3

35

16%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

141

67%

LEVEL 2

34

16%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

121

61%

LEVEL 2

29

15%

LEVEL 3

24

12%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

16

59%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

15

50%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

56
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

52

37%

LEVEL 2

31

22%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

65
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

36

27%

LEVEL 2

30

23%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

31

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

176

82%

LEVEL 2

33

15%

LEVEL 3

4

2%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

154

74%

LEVEL 2

38

18%

LEVEL 3

12

6%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

17

65%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

16

64%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

187

56%

LEVEL 2

74

22%

LEVEL 3

53

16%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

147

46%

LEVEL 2

75

24%

LEVEL 3

56

18%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

85

92%

LEVEL 2

4

4%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

82

86%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

76
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

214

59%

LEVEL 2

71

20%

LEVEL 3

55

15%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

97
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

173

51%

LEVEL 2

72

21%

LEVEL 3

57

17%

LEVEL 4

40

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

58

88%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

56

80%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

39

33%

LEVEL 2

30

25%

LEVEL 3

36

30%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

34

29%

LEVEL 2

25

21%

LEVEL 3

31

26%

LEVEL 4

29

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

233

76%

LEVEL 2

48

16%

LEVEL 3

20

7%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

195

67%

LEVEL 2

58

20%

LEVEL 3

28

10%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

75
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

268

64%

LEVEL 2

75

18%

LEVEL 3

54

13%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

100
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

217

55%

LEVEL 2

81

20%

LEVEL 3

59

15%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

12

86%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.