500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CLARY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

202

56%

LEVEL 2

125

35%

LEVEL 3

23

6%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

245

60%

LEVEL 2

123

30%

LEVEL 3

26

6%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

91

48%

LEVEL 2

77

41%

LEVEL 3

15

8%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

100

48%

LEVEL 2

81

39%

LEVEL 3

19

9%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

11
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

111

65%

LEVEL 2

48

28%

LEVEL 3

8

5%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

9
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

145

74%

LEVEL 2

42

21%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

23

48%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

15

33%

LEVEL 2

19

42%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

161

60%

LEVEL 2

91

34%

LEVEL 3

17

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

199

65%

LEVEL 2

86

28%

LEVEL 3

14

5%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

11

55%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

11

50%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

133

47%

LEVEL 2

117

42%

LEVEL 3

23

8%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

36
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

167

53%

LEVEL 2

115

36%

LEVEL 3

24

8%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

69

90%

LEVEL 2

8

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

78

89%

LEVEL 2

8

9%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

19

33%

LEVEL 2

26

46%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

49

48%

LEVEL 2

36

35%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

183

61%

LEVEL 2

99

33%

LEVEL 3

15

5%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

196

65%

LEVEL 2

87

29%

LEVEL 3

15

5%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.