500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SALEM HYDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

165

56%

LEVEL 2

73

25%

LEVEL 3

42

14%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

175

59%

LEVEL 2

71

24%

LEVEL 3

31

10%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

71

57%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

15

12%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

19
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

78

60%

LEVEL 2

32

25%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

94

55%

LEVEL 2

40

23%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

97

58%

LEVEL 2

39

23%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

16

62%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

18

64%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

31
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

62

53%

LEVEL 2

25

21%

LEVEL 3

22

19%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

27
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

49

46%

LEVEL 2

30

28%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

59

57%

LEVEL 2

36

35%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

73

67%

LEVEL 2

28

26%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

17

63%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

20

71%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

119

49%

LEVEL 2

68

28%

LEVEL 3

39

16%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

128

53%

LEVEL 2

63

26%

LEVEL 3

30

12%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

46

85%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

47

84%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

55
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

114

48%

LEVEL 2

70

29%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

49
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

124

51%

LEVEL 2

68

28%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

51

88%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

51

91%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

17

32%

LEVEL 2

19

36%

LEVEL 3

11

21%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

26

38%

LEVEL 2

21

31%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

10

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

148

61%

LEVEL 2

54

22%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

149

65%

LEVEL 2

50

22%

LEVEL 3

20

9%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

57
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

162

56%

LEVEL 2

71

24%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

50
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

169

59%

LEVEL 2

69

24%

LEVEL 3

30

10%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.