500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SALEM HYDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

116

47%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

26

11%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

100

45%

LEVEL 2

78

35%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

51

40%

LEVEL 2

42

33%

LEVEL 3

19

15%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

41

37%

LEVEL 2

42

38%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

65

55%

LEVEL 2

41

34%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

59

53%

LEVEL 2

36

32%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

29
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

55

43%

LEVEL 2

43

34%

LEVEL 3

14

11%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

27
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

44

42%

LEVEL 2

33

32%

LEVEL 3

19

18%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

44

56%

LEVEL 2

27

34%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

43

52%

LEVEL 2

31

37%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

9

45%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

72

38%

LEVEL 2

75

39%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

43
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

70

38%

LEVEL 2

70

38%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

44

83%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

30

75%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

36

36%

LEVEL 2

36

36%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

17

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

27

39%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

14

20%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

80

56%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

14

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

73

47%

LEVEL 2

57

37%

LEVEL 3

19

12%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.