500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

ROBERTS K-8 SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

227

51%

LEVEL 2

132

30%

LEVEL 3

53

12%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

209

55%

LEVEL 2

110

29%

LEVEL 3

43

11%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

91

50%

LEVEL 2

65

36%

LEVEL 3

19

10%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

79

49%

LEVEL 2

53

33%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

136

53%

LEVEL 2

67

26%

LEVEL 3

34

13%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

130

59%

LEVEL 2

57

26%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

12

55%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

60
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

35

25%

LEVEL 2

46

33%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

21

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

42
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

30

27%

LEVEL 2

41

36%

LEVEL 3

28

25%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

146

65%

LEVEL 2

66

29%

LEVEL 3

10

4%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

132

67%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

11

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

33

73%

LEVEL 2

10

22%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

29

78%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

150

44%

LEVEL 2

117

34%

LEVEL 3

50

15%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

141

48%

LEVEL 2

96

33%

LEVEL 3

43

15%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

77

79%

LEVEL 2

15

15%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

68

80%

LEVEL 2

14

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

81
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

211

50%

LEVEL 2

129

31%

LEVEL 3

52

12%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

61
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

195

54%

LEVEL 2

106

29%

LEVEL 3

43

12%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

16

80%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

14

78%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

76

38%

LEVEL 2

57

29%

LEVEL 3

38

19%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

60

39%

LEVEL 2

50

33%

LEVEL 3

26

17%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

151

62%

LEVEL 2

75

31%

LEVEL 3

15

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

149

65%

LEVEL 2

60

26%

LEVEL 3

17

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.