500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SOUTHSIDE ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

250

60%

LEVEL 2

102

25%

LEVEL 3

43

10%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

202

49%

LEVEL 2

123

30%

LEVEL 3

61

15%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

120

57%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

106

50%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

130

64%

LEVEL 2

42

21%

LEVEL 3

19

9%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

96

48%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

41
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

213

63%

LEVEL 2

85

25%

LEVEL 3

30

9%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

63
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

176

53%

LEVEL 2

94

28%

LEVEL 3

45

14%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

33

63%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

22

39%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

222

59%

LEVEL 2

96

25%

LEVEL 3

40

11%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

175

47%

LEVEL 2

115

31%

LEVEL 3

58

15%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

28

74%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

27

71%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

87
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

201

49%

LEVEL 2

120

29%

LEVEL 3

60

15%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

33

50%

LEVEL 2

22

33%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

15

44%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

217

62%

LEVEL 2

80

23%

LEVEL 3

37

11%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

192

51%

LEVEL 2

108

28%

LEVEL 3

55

15%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.