500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CANANDAIGUA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 751

LEVEL 1

167

22%

LEVEL 2

327

44%

LEVEL 3

198

26%

LEVEL 4

59

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

81

18%

LEVEL 2

187

40%

LEVEL 3

136

29%

LEVEL 4

58

13%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

76

21%

LEVEL 2

166

45%

LEVEL 3

101

28%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

97

44%

LEVEL 3

74

34%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

132
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

91

24%

LEVEL 2

161

42%

LEVEL 3

97

25%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

53

22%

LEVEL 2

90

37%

LEVEL 3

62

26%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

238
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 677

LEVEL 1

144

21%

LEVEL 2

295

44%

LEVEL 3

184

27%

LEVEL 4

54

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

177
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

68

16%

LEVEL 2

171

41%

LEVEL 3

126

30%

LEVEL 4

51

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

9

39%

LEVEL 2

11

48%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

10

42%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 644

LEVEL 1

97

15%

LEVEL 2

297

46%

LEVEL 3

192

30%

LEVEL 4

58

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

164

42%

LEVEL 3

131

34%

LEVEL 4

58

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

70

65%

LEVEL 2

30

28%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

45

62%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

222
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

75

15%

LEVEL 2

218

42%

LEVEL 3

169

33%

LEVEL 4

53

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

35

11%

LEVEL 2

119

38%

LEVEL 3

111

35%

LEVEL 4

52

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

92

39%

LEVEL 2

109

46%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

46

32%

LEVEL 2

68

47%

LEVEL 3

25

17%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.