500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

TAFT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

62

19%

LEVEL 2

129

40%

LEVEL 3

80

25%

LEVEL 4

48

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

59

24%

LEVEL 2

89

37%

LEVEL 3

55

23%

LEVEL 4

40

16%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

28

19%

LEVEL 2

57

39%

LEVEL 3

37

26%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

29

26%

LEVEL 2

39

35%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

24

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

34

20%

LEVEL 2

72

41%

LEVEL 3

43

25%

LEVEL 4

25

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

30

23%

LEVEL 2

50

38%

LEVEL 3

35

27%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

38

17%

LEVEL 2

89

40%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

67
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

28

18%

LEVEL 2

58

38%

LEVEL 3

43

28%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

10

42%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

11

52%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

11

20%

LEVEL 2

21

39%

LEVEL 3

14

26%

LEVEL 4

8

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

18

33%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

12

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

35

13%

LEVEL 2

119

43%

LEVEL 3

79

28%

LEVEL 4

47

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

38

18%

LEVEL 2

81

38%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

40

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

27

69%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

21

70%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

126
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

61

20%

LEVEL 2

125

40%

LEVEL 3

78

25%

LEVEL 4

48

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

95
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

52

22%

LEVEL 2

86

37%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

40

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

40

17%

LEVEL 2

93

38%

LEVEL 3

67

28%

LEVEL 4

42

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

36

20%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

48

27%

LEVEL 4

36

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

22

29%

LEVEL 2

36

47%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

23

37%

LEVEL 2

28

45%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.