500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MIDDLETOWN TWIN TOWERS MS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 771

LEVEL 1

309

40%

LEVEL 2

353

46%

LEVEL 3

93

12%

LEVEL 4

16

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

223

41%

LEVEL 2

243

45%

LEVEL 3

61

11%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

134

37%

LEVEL 2

172

48%

LEVEL 3

47

13%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

110

42%

LEVEL 2

109

42%

LEVEL 3

34

13%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

175

43%

LEVEL 2

181

44%

LEVEL 3

46

11%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

113

40%

LEVEL 2

134

47%

LEVEL 3

27

10%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

8

67%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

27
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

38

29%

LEVEL 2

68

51%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

16
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

24

30%

LEVEL 2

39

49%

LEVEL 3

12

15%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

84

42%

LEVEL 2

84

42%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

60

43%

LEVEL 2

61

44%

LEVEL 3

13

9%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

184

44%

LEVEL 2

189

45%

LEVEL 3

42

10%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

130

43%

LEVEL 2

137

45%

LEVEL 3

29

10%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 648

LEVEL 1

241

37%

LEVEL 2

307

47%

LEVEL 3

87

13%

LEVEL 4

13

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

180

39%

LEVEL 2

212

46%

LEVEL 3

57

12%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

68

55%

LEVEL 2

46

37%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

43

54%

LEVEL 2

31

39%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

108
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 702

LEVEL 1

255

36%

LEVEL 2

339

48%

LEVEL 3

92

13%

LEVEL 4

16

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

77
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

166

35%

LEVEL 2

231

49%

LEVEL 3

60

13%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

54

78%

LEVEL 2

14

20%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

57

81%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

40

23%

LEVEL 2

96

56%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

24

23%

LEVEL 2

54

52%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 600

LEVEL 1

269

45%

LEVEL 2

257

43%

LEVEL 3

66

11%

LEVEL 4

8

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

199

45%

LEVEL 2

189

43%

LEVEL 3

43

10%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

108
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 765

LEVEL 1

306

40%

LEVEL 2

351

46%

LEVEL 3

92

12%

LEVEL 4

16

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.