500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MIDDLETOWN TWIN TOWERS MS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 649

LEVEL 1

200

31%

LEVEL 2

274

42%

LEVEL 3

123

19%

LEVEL 4

52

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 679

LEVEL 1

285

42%

LEVEL 2

219

32%

LEVEL 3

122

18%

LEVEL 4

53

8%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

74

22%

LEVEL 2

142

43%

LEVEL 3

81

24%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

112
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

111

32%

LEVEL 2

120

35%

LEVEL 3

73

21%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

126

40%

LEVEL 2

132

42%

LEVEL 3

42

13%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

174

52%

LEVEL 2

99

29%

LEVEL 3

49

15%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

13

43%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

24
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

18

23%

LEVEL 2

35

45%

LEVEL 3

16

21%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

28
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

21

30%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

10

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

62
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

42

24%

LEVEL 2

72

41%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

49
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

66

40%

LEVEL 2

52

31%

LEVEL 3

32

19%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

77
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

131

37%

LEVEL 2

149

42%

LEVEL 3

56

16%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

84
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

182

46%

LEVEL 2

129

33%

LEVEL 3

64

16%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

138

25%

LEVEL 2

250

45%

LEVEL 3

120

21%

LEVEL 4

52

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 586

LEVEL 1

217

37%

LEVEL 2

198

34%

LEVEL 3

119

20%

LEVEL 4

52

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

62

70%

LEVEL 2

24

27%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

68

73%

LEVEL 2

21

23%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

175
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 566

LEVEL 1

137

24%

LEVEL 2

254

45%

LEVEL 3

123

22%

LEVEL 4

52

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

174
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 585

LEVEL 1

208

36%

LEVEL 2

203

35%

LEVEL 3

121

21%

LEVEL 4

53

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

63

76%

LEVEL 2

20

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

77

82%

LEVEL 2

16

17%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

14

12%

LEVEL 2

54

45%

LEVEL 3

34

28%

LEVEL 4

19

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

33

25%

LEVEL 2

43

33%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

22

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 528

LEVEL 1

186

35%

LEVEL 2

220

42%

LEVEL 3

89

17%

LEVEL 4

33

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

252

46%

LEVEL 2

176

32%

LEVEL 3

88

16%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.