500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MINISINK VALLEY INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

135

26%

LEVEL 2

154

30%

LEVEL 3

155

30%

LEVEL 4

73

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

64

18%

LEVEL 2

129

36%

LEVEL 3

107

30%

LEVEL 4

60

17%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

62

26%

LEVEL 2

75

31%

LEVEL 3

72

30%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

30

17%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

59

33%

LEVEL 4

29

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

124
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

73

26%

LEVEL 2

79

29%

LEVEL 3

83

30%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

34

19%

LEVEL 2

68

38%

LEVEL 3

48

27%

LEVEL 4

31

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

206
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

93

21%

LEVEL 2

139

32%

LEVEL 3

138

32%

LEVEL 4

68

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

145
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

41

14%

LEVEL 2

111

37%

LEVEL 3

91

31%

LEVEL 4

54

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

15

60%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

25

52%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

11

23%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

14

38%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

11

30%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

74

17%

LEVEL 2

142

33%

LEVEL 3

150

34%

LEVEL 4

69

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

120

39%

LEVEL 3

103

33%

LEVEL 4

58

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

61

74%

LEVEL 2

12

15%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

34

69%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

201
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

85

20%

LEVEL 2

129

31%

LEVEL 3

135

33%

LEVEL 4

66

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

35

13%

LEVEL 2

97

35%

LEVEL 3

96

35%

LEVEL 4

48

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

50

49%

LEVEL 2

25

25%

LEVEL 3

20

20%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

29

35%

LEVEL 2

32

38%

LEVEL 3

11

13%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.