500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

FOSTERTOWN SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

72

30%

LEVEL 4

61

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

35

14%

LEVEL 2

88

34%

LEVEL 3

77

30%

LEVEL 4

56

22%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

14

13%

LEVEL 2

31

28%

LEVEL 3

37

34%

LEVEL 4

28

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

21

17%

LEVEL 2

45

37%

LEVEL 3

34

28%

LEVEL 4

22

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

43

33%

LEVEL 3

35

27%

LEVEL 4

33

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

43

32%

LEVEL 3

43

32%

LEVEL 4

34

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

48
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

12

19%

LEVEL 3

20

32%

LEVEL 4

28

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

24

32%

LEVEL 4

26

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

15

27%

LEVEL 2

19

34%

LEVEL 3

20

36%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

7

16%

LEVEL 2

20

45%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

12

11%

LEVEL 2

39

37%

LEVEL 3

30

28%

LEVEL 4

25

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

57
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

20

17%

LEVEL 2

40

34%

LEVEL 3

37

32%

LEVEL 4

20

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

58

28%

LEVEL 3

68

33%

LEVEL 4

60

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

75

34%

LEVEL 4

53

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

11

34%

LEVEL 2

16

50%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

12

36%

LEVEL 2

16

48%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

127
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

68

32%

LEVEL 4

59

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

131
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

84

34%

LEVEL 3

76

31%

LEVEL 4

55

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

10

36%

LEVEL 2

12

43%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

36

40%

LEVEL 4

32

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

29

27%

LEVEL 3

42

39%

LEVEL 4

33

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

32

21%

LEVEL 2

53

35%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

29

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

30

20%

LEVEL 2

59

40%

LEVEL 3

35

24%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.