500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

FULTON JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

208

36%

LEVEL 2

247

43%

LEVEL 3

99

17%

LEVEL 4

20

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

237

49%

LEVEL 2

163

34%

LEVEL 3

65

13%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

97

37%

LEVEL 2

109

42%

LEVEL 3

47

18%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

104

49%

LEVEL 2

72

34%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

111

35%

LEVEL 2

138

44%

LEVEL 3

52

17%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

133

49%

LEVEL 2

91

34%

LEVEL 3

39

14%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

114
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 532

LEVEL 1

184

35%

LEVEL 2

234

44%

LEVEL 3

94

18%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

79
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

214

48%

LEVEL 2

154

34%

LEVEL 3

61

14%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

10

63%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

11

58%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

149

30%

LEVEL 2

233

47%

LEVEL 3

98

20%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

185

44%

LEVEL 2

156

37%

LEVEL 3

64

15%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

59

80%

LEVEL 2

14

19%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

52

87%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

55

21%

LEVEL 2

125

48%

LEVEL 3

63

24%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

65

33%

LEVEL 2

76

39%

LEVEL 3

38

19%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

153

49%

LEVEL 2

122

39%

LEVEL 3

36

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

172

60%

LEVEL 2

87

30%

LEVEL 3

27

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.