500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

FULTON JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

200

37%

LEVEL 2

202

38%

LEVEL 3

107

20%

LEVEL 4

28

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

179

45%

LEVEL 2

115

29%

LEVEL 3

84

21%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

65

26%

LEVEL 2

109

44%

LEVEL 3

53

21%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

72

40%

LEVEL 2

54

30%

LEVEL 3

47

26%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

135

47%

LEVEL 2

93

32%

LEVEL 3

54

19%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

107

50%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

182

36%

LEVEL 2

191

38%

LEVEL 3

101

20%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

165

45%

LEVEL 2

104

29%

LEVEL 3

80

22%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

8

42%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

151

32%

LEVEL 2

191

40%

LEVEL 3

107

22%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

129

39%

LEVEL 2

106

32%

LEVEL 3

83

25%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

49

82%

LEVEL 2

11

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

50

83%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

43

19%

LEVEL 2

96

42%

LEVEL 3

68

29%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

40

26%

LEVEL 2

51

33%

LEVEL 3

52

33%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

157

51%

LEVEL 2

106

35%

LEVEL 3

39

13%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

139

58%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

32

13%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.