500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

EMERSON J DILLON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

94

25%

LEVEL 2

93

24%

LEVEL 3

121

32%

LEVEL 4

75

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

85

22%

LEVEL 2

106

27%

LEVEL 3

127

32%

LEVEL 4

74

19%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

45

25%

LEVEL 2

42

23%

LEVEL 3

53

29%

LEVEL 4

40

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

40

21%

LEVEL 2

56

30%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

40

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

49

24%

LEVEL 2

51

25%

LEVEL 3

68

33%

LEVEL 4

35

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

108
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

45

22%

LEVEL 2

50

25%

LEVEL 3

74

36%

LEVEL 4

34

17%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

188
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

87

24%

LEVEL 2

90

25%

LEVEL 3

114

31%

LEVEL 4

74

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

193
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

82

22%

LEVEL 2

101

27%

LEVEL 3

122

32%

LEVEL 4

71

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

64

18%

LEVEL 2

88

25%

LEVEL 3

120

35%

LEVEL 4

75

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

59

16%

LEVEL 2

102

28%

LEVEL 3

125

35%

LEVEL 4

74

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

30

83%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

26

81%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

30

16%

LEVEL 2

40

21%

LEVEL 3

70

37%

LEVEL 4

49

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

56

29%

LEVEL 3

68

35%

LEVEL 4

46

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

64

33%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

51

26%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

59

30%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

59

30%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

194
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

90

24%

LEVEL 2

91

24%

LEVEL 3

119

32%

LEVEL 4

75

20%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

199
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

79

21%

LEVEL 2

105

27%

LEVEL 3

125

33%

LEVEL 4

74

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.