500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

EMERSON J DILLON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

110

26%

LEVEL 2

164

39%

LEVEL 3

111

27%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

108

31%

LEVEL 2

114

33%

LEVEL 3

77

22%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

61

28%

LEVEL 2

87

40%

LEVEL 3

51

23%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

58

34%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

20

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

49

25%

LEVEL 2

77

39%

LEVEL 3

60

30%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

50

29%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

136
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

101

26%

LEVEL 2

157

40%

LEVEL 3

105

27%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

117
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

100

31%

LEVEL 2

108

33%

LEVEL 3

76

23%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

73

20%

LEVEL 2

154

42%

LEVEL 3

109

30%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

76

25%

LEVEL 2

110

36%

LEVEL 3

76

25%

LEVEL 4

46

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

37

76%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

32

86%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

74

40%

LEVEL 3

60

33%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

32

20%

LEVEL 2

63

39%

LEVEL 3

37

23%

LEVEL 4

28

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

85

36%

LEVEL 2

90

38%

LEVEL 3

51

22%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

76

41%

LEVEL 2

51

28%

LEVEL 3

40

22%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.