500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PUTNAM VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 525

LEVEL 1

144

27%

LEVEL 2

212

40%

LEVEL 3

129

25%

LEVEL 4

40

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

118

34%

LEVEL 2

133

38%

LEVEL 3

81

23%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

56

21%

LEVEL 2

106

40%

LEVEL 3

76

29%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

42

25%

LEVEL 2

65

39%

LEVEL 3

48

29%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

88

34%

LEVEL 2

106

41%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

76

42%

LEVEL 2

68

38%

LEVEL 3

33

18%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

150
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

105

25%

LEVEL 2

165

39%

LEVEL 3

117

28%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

80
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

87

32%

LEVEL 2

109

39%

LEVEL 3

68

25%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

31

39%

LEVEL 2

35

44%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

23

44%

LEVEL 2

18

35%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

94

20%

LEVEL 2

200

43%

LEVEL 3

126

27%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

82

27%

LEVEL 2

126

41%

LEVEL 3

79

26%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

50

77%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

36

80%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

169
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

140

27%

LEVEL 2

211

41%

LEVEL 3

129

25%

LEVEL 4

40

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

98
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

111

33%

LEVEL 2

128

38%

LEVEL 3

81

24%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

104

24%

LEVEL 2

183

42%

LEVEL 3

111

25%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

86

31%

LEVEL 2

112

40%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

40

45%

LEVEL 2

29

33%

LEVEL 3

18

20%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

32

47%

LEVEL 2

21

31%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.