500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

HOWARD L GOFF SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

412
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 881

LEVEL 1

143

16%

LEVEL 2

326

37%

LEVEL 3

273

31%

LEVEL 4

139

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

354
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 767

LEVEL 1

141

18%

LEVEL 2

272

35%

LEVEL 3

237

31%

LEVEL 4

117

15%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

220
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

55

13%

LEVEL 2

165

38%

LEVEL 3

150

34%

LEVEL 4

70

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

202
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

46

12%

LEVEL 2

144

37%

LEVEL 3

130

33%

LEVEL 4

72

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

192
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

88

20%

LEVEL 2

161

37%

LEVEL 3

123

28%

LEVEL 4

69

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

152
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

95

25%

LEVEL 2

128

34%

LEVEL 3

107

29%

LEVEL 4

45

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

22
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

8

16%

LEVEL 2

20

40%

LEVEL 3

15

30%

LEVEL 4

7

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

20
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

8

18%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

12

27%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

12

38%

LEVEL 3

14

44%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

6

15%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

14

35%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

356
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 735

LEVEL 1

114

16%

LEVEL 2

265

36%

LEVEL 3

232

32%

LEVEL 4

124

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

297
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 628

LEVEL 1

108

17%

LEVEL 2

223

36%

LEVEL 3

202

32%

LEVEL 4

95

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

11

24%

LEVEL 2

21

47%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

13

39%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

402
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 726

LEVEL 1

56

8%

LEVEL 2

268

37%

LEVEL 3

263

36%

LEVEL 4

139

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

344
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 638

LEVEL 1

59

9%

LEVEL 2

235

37%

LEVEL 3

227

36%

LEVEL 4

117

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

87

56%

LEVEL 2

58

37%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

82

64%

LEVEL 2

37

29%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

354
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 761

LEVEL 1

137

18%

LEVEL 2

270

35%

LEVEL 3

237

31%

LEVEL 4

117

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

378
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 731

LEVEL 1

90

12%

LEVEL 2

263

36%

LEVEL 3

247

34%

LEVEL 4

131

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

323
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 617

LEVEL 1

81

13%

LEVEL 2

213

35%

LEVEL 3

213

35%

LEVEL 4

110

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

53

35%

LEVEL 2

63

42%

LEVEL 3

26

17%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

60

40%

LEVEL 2

59

39%

LEVEL 3

24

16%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.