500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

RENSSELAER PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

173

34%

LEVEL 2

176

35%

LEVEL 3

124

25%

LEVEL 4

32

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

176

33%

LEVEL 2

176

33%

LEVEL 3

126

24%

LEVEL 4

48

9%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

68

28%

LEVEL 2

89

37%

LEVEL 3

61

25%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

68

27%

LEVEL 2

92

36%

LEVEL 3

62

24%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

105

40%

LEVEL 2

87

33%

LEVEL 3

63

24%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

108

40%

LEVEL 2

84

31%

LEVEL 3

64

24%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

82

29%

LEVEL 2

104

37%

LEVEL 3

75

26%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

108
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

87

29%

LEVEL 2

103

35%

LEVEL 3

77

26%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

39

43%

LEVEL 2

28

31%

LEVEL 3

17

19%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

32
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

32

33%

LEVEL 2

34

35%

LEVEL 3

25

26%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

25

37%

LEVEL 2

31

46%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

34

43%

LEVEL 2

23

29%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

106

25%

LEVEL 2

156

37%

LEVEL 3

123

29%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

111

25%

LEVEL 2

160

36%

LEVEL 3

121

28%

LEVEL 4

48

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

67

76%

LEVEL 2

20

23%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

65

76%

LEVEL 2

16

19%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

153
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

162

33%

LEVEL 2

170

35%

LEVEL 3

121

25%

LEVEL 4

32

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

172
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

168

33%

LEVEL 2

172

34%

LEVEL 3

124

24%

LEVEL 4

48

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

11

55%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

16

17%

LEVEL 2

30

32%

LEVEL 3

39

41%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

21

18%

LEVEL 2

32

28%

LEVEL 3

43

38%

LEVEL 4

18

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

157

38%

LEVEL 2

146

36%

LEVEL 3

85

21%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

155

38%

LEVEL 2

144

35%

LEVEL 3

83

20%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

151
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

170

34%

LEVEL 2

173

35%

LEVEL 3

120

24%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

165
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

159

32%

LEVEL 2

166

34%

LEVEL 3

118

24%

LEVEL 4

47

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

17

47%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.