500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SOUTH ORANGETOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

333
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 666

LEVEL 1

102

15%

LEVEL 2

231

35%

LEVEL 3

200

30%

LEVEL 4

133

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

58

17%

LEVEL 2

122

36%

LEVEL 3

98

29%

LEVEL 4

61

18%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

172
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

42

13%

LEVEL 2

103

32%

LEVEL 3

101

32%

LEVEL 4

71

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

25

15%

LEVEL 2

48

30%

LEVEL 3

59

36%

LEVEL 4

30

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

161
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

60

17%

LEVEL 2

128

37%

LEVEL 3

99

28%

LEVEL 4

62

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

33

19%

LEVEL 2

74

42%

LEVEL 3

39

22%

LEVEL 4

31

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

43
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

23

37%

LEVEL 4

20

32%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

18

38%

LEVEL 4

14

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

271
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

66

13%

LEVEL 2

186

36%

LEVEL 3

163

31%

LEVEL 4

108

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

110
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

33

14%

LEVEL 2

89

38%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

44

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

25

40%

LEVEL 2

27

43%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

19

41%

LEVEL 2

18

39%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

327
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

64

11%

LEVEL 2

216

36%

LEVEL 3

195

32%

LEVEL 4

132

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

108

36%

LEVEL 3

98

33%

LEVEL 4

59

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

38

64%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

23

59%

LEVEL 2

14

36%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

332
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 658

LEVEL 1

95

14%

LEVEL 2

231

35%

LEVEL 3

199

30%

LEVEL 4

133

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

158
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

53

16%

LEVEL 2

120

36%

LEVEL 3

97

29%

LEVEL 4

61

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

7

88%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

316
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 599

LEVEL 1

70

12%

LEVEL 2

213

36%

LEVEL 3

188

31%

LEVEL 4

128

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

152
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

40

13%

LEVEL 2

108

36%

LEVEL 3

92

31%

LEVEL 4

60

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

32

48%

LEVEL 2

18

27%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

18

46%

LEVEL 2

14

36%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.