500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SOUTH ORANGETOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

83

19%

LEVEL 2

154

36%

LEVEL 3

126

29%

LEVEL 4

70

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

60

15%

LEVEL 2

142

36%

LEVEL 3

124

32%

LEVEL 4

64

16%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

119
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

80

37%

LEVEL 3

74

34%

LEVEL 4

45

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

67

37%

LEVEL 4

39

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

63

29%

LEVEL 2

74

35%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

45

22%

LEVEL 2

81

39%

LEVEL 3

57

27%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

38
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

24

40%

LEVEL 4

14

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

19

40%

LEVEL 4

9

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

135
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

47

16%

LEVEL 2

118

39%

LEVEL 3

85

28%

LEVEL 4

50

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

139
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

35

13%

LEVEL 2

98

36%

LEVEL 3

88

32%

LEVEL 4

51

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

22

41%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

16

30%

LEVEL 2

25

46%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

147

38%

LEVEL 3

124

32%

LEVEL 4

69

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

132

38%

LEVEL 3

123

35%

LEVEL 4

63

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

34

77%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

26

68%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

177
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

58

15%

LEVEL 2

148

39%

LEVEL 3

111

29%

LEVEL 4

66

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

178
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

41

12%

LEVEL 2

125

36%

LEVEL 3

116

34%

LEVEL 4

62

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

25

50%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

15

30%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

19

41%

LEVEL 2

17

37%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.