500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

POMONA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

157

38%

LEVEL 2

152

37%

LEVEL 3

84

20%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

146

39%

LEVEL 2

155

41%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

69

33%

LEVEL 2

78

37%

LEVEL 3

50

24%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

60

31%

LEVEL 2

79

41%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

88

44%

LEVEL 2

74

37%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

86

46%

LEVEL 2

76

41%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

47
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

58

35%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

32

30%

LEVEL 2

45

42%

LEVEL 3

24

23%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

94

44%

LEVEL 2

82

38%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

108

43%

LEVEL 2

101

40%

LEVEL 3

32

13%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

81

26%

LEVEL 2

126

41%

LEVEL 3

82

27%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

89

31%

LEVEL 2

125

43%

LEVEL 3

60

21%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

76

73%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

57

65%

LEVEL 2

30

34%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

102
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

83

25%

LEVEL 2

142

43%

LEVEL 3

84

26%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

78
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

65

24%

LEVEL 2

123

46%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

74

88%

LEVEL 2

10

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

81

72%

LEVEL 2

32

28%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

19

39%

LEVEL 4

7

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

8

38%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

146

40%

LEVEL 2

140

39%

LEVEL 3

65

18%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

138

39%

LEVEL 2

146

41%

LEVEL 3

58

16%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.