500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MASSENA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

230
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 666

LEVEL 1

183

27%

LEVEL 2

253

38%

LEVEL 3

170

26%

LEVEL 4

60

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

283
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 919

LEVEL 1

301

33%

LEVEL 2

335

36%

LEVEL 3

194

21%

LEVEL 4

89

10%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

80

26%

LEVEL 2

123

39%

LEVEL 3

80

26%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

142
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

145

31%

LEVEL 2

179

38%

LEVEL 3

98

21%

LEVEL 4

44

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

103

29%

LEVEL 2

130

37%

LEVEL 3

90

25%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

156

34%

LEVEL 2

156

34%

LEVEL 3

96

21%

LEVEL 4

45

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

14
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

25

50%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

12
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

23

35%

LEVEL 2

31

47%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

206
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 593

LEVEL 1

167

28%

LEVEL 2

220

37%

LEVEL 3

151

25%

LEVEL 4

55

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

261
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 808

LEVEL 1

262

32%

LEVEL 2

285

35%

LEVEL 3

176

22%

LEVEL 4

85

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

10

42%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

114

20%

LEVEL 2

233

41%

LEVEL 3

165

29%

LEVEL 4

59

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

269
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 757

LEVEL 1

186

25%

LEVEL 2

302

40%

LEVEL 3

185

24%

LEVEL 4

84

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

69

73%

LEVEL 2

20

21%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

115

71%

LEVEL 2

33

20%

LEVEL 3

9

6%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

102

38%

LEVEL 3

88

33%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

83

23%

LEVEL 2

139

38%

LEVEL 3

95

26%

LEVEL 4

51

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

146

37%

LEVEL 2

151

38%

LEVEL 3

82

21%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

218

40%

LEVEL 2

196

36%

LEVEL 3

99

18%

LEVEL 4

38

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.