500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MASSENA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,180

LEVEL 1

452

38%

LEVEL 2

465

39%

LEVEL 3

185

16%

LEVEL 4

78

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 848

LEVEL 1

313

37%

LEVEL 2

315

37%

LEVEL 3

161

19%

LEVEL 4

59

7%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

156
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

183

32%

LEVEL 2

232

41%

LEVEL 3

112

20%

LEVEL 4

44

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

132
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

125

30%

LEVEL 2

158

38%

LEVEL 3

95

23%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 609

LEVEL 1

269

44%

LEVEL 2

233

38%

LEVEL 3

73

12%

LEVEL 4

34

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

188

43%

LEVEL 2

157

36%

LEVEL 3

66

15%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

21
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

56

46%

LEVEL 2

44

36%

LEVEL 3

19

16%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

14
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

31

42%

LEVEL 2

28

38%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

232
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,006

LEVEL 1

376

37%

LEVEL 2

398

40%

LEVEL 3

161

16%

LEVEL 4

71

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

199
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 746

LEVEL 1

274

37%

LEVEL 2

273

37%

LEVEL 3

146

20%

LEVEL 4

53

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

9

64%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

13

57%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,015

LEVEL 1

321

32%

LEVEL 2

435

43%

LEVEL 3

183

18%

LEVEL 4

76

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 719

LEVEL 1

213

30%

LEVEL 2

291

40%

LEVEL 3

158

22%

LEVEL 4

57

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

131

79%

LEVEL 2

30

18%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

100

78%

LEVEL 2

24

19%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

169
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

137

28%

LEVEL 2

192

39%

LEVEL 3

107

21%

LEVEL 4

62

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

77

23%

LEVEL 2

126

37%

LEVEL 3

95

28%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 682

LEVEL 1

315

46%

LEVEL 2

273

40%

LEVEL 3

78

11%

LEVEL 4

16

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

236

46%

LEVEL 2

189

37%

LEVEL 3

66

13%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.