500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CORINTH CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

177

36%

LEVEL 2

158

32%

LEVEL 3

112

23%

LEVEL 4

41

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

184

39%

LEVEL 2

132

28%

LEVEL 3

112

23%

LEVEL 4

49

10%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

87

36%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

61

25%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

90

37%

LEVEL 2

62

26%

LEVEL 3

65

27%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

90

37%

LEVEL 2

81

33%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

94

40%

LEVEL 2

70

30%

LEVEL 3

47

20%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

148
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

170

36%

LEVEL 2

148

32%

LEVEL 3

110

24%

LEVEL 4

38

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

154
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

175

38%

LEVEL 2

129

28%

LEVEL 3

109

24%

LEVEL 4

45

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

137

31%

LEVEL 2

153

35%

LEVEL 3

111

25%

LEVEL 4

41

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

140

33%

LEVEL 2

129

30%

LEVEL 3

111

26%

LEVEL 4

49

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

40

87%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

44

92%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

55

24%

LEVEL 2

73

32%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

51

24%

LEVEL 2

58

27%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

38

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

122

46%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

133

50%

LEVEL 2

74

28%

LEVEL 3

48

18%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

150
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

175

36%

LEVEL 2

155

32%

LEVEL 3

110

23%

LEVEL 4

40

8%

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

156
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

182

39%

LEVEL 2

129

28%

LEVEL 3

109

23%

LEVEL 4

47

10%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

147
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

167

36%

LEVEL 2

155

33%

LEVEL 3

106

23%

LEVEL 4

41

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

158
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

180

38%

LEVEL 2

130

28%

LEVEL 3

110

24%

LEVEL 4

48

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

10

53%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.