500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MECHANICVILLE JUNIOR-SENIOR HS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

107

38%

LEVEL 2

113

40%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

107

38%

LEVEL 2

118

42%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

40

31%

LEVEL 2

52

40%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

36

30%

LEVEL 2

55

46%

LEVEL 3

21

18%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

67

44%

LEVEL 2

61

40%

LEVEL 3

18

12%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

71

44%

LEVEL 2

63

39%

LEVEL 3

19

12%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

60
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

99

37%

LEVEL 2

107

40%

LEVEL 3

48

18%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

51
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

99

38%

LEVEL 2

111

43%

LEVEL 3

37

14%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

70

29%

LEVEL 2

111

46%

LEVEL 3

49

20%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

37

93%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

55

32%

LEVEL 2

72

42%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

52

31%

LEVEL 2

76

45%

LEVEL 3

28

17%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

52

47%

LEVEL 2

41

37%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

55

50%

LEVEL 2

42

38%

LEVEL 3

12

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.