500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PAIGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

115

36%

LEVEL 2

133

41%

LEVEL 3

60

19%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

91

40%

LEVEL 2

76

33%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

47

29%

LEVEL 2

62

38%

LEVEL 3

44

27%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

29

26%

LEVEL 2

39

35%

LEVEL 3

29

26%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

68

43%

LEVEL 2

71

44%

LEVEL 3

16

10%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

62

53%

LEVEL 2

37

32%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

13

26%

LEVEL 2

22

44%

LEVEL 3

13

26%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

15

39%

LEVEL 2

13

34%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

40
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

58

34%

LEVEL 2

71

42%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

38
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

37

36%

LEVEL 2

28

27%

LEVEL 3

28

27%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

25

42%

LEVEL 2

21

35%

LEVEL 3

12

20%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

24

44%

LEVEL 2

21

38%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

76

28%

LEVEL 2

122

45%

LEVEL 3

59

22%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

67

35%

LEVEL 2

65

34%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

39

76%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

24

63%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

74
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

104

34%

LEVEL 2

128

42%

LEVEL 3

59

19%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

60
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

83

38%

LEVEL 2

75

34%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

11

65%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

8

89%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

23

20%

LEVEL 2

52

44%

LEVEL 3

31

26%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

19

24%

LEVEL 2

34

43%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

92

45%

LEVEL 2

81

39%

LEVEL 3

29

14%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

72

49%

LEVEL 2

42

29%

LEVEL 3

23

16%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.