500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

WILLIAM H GOLDING MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

124

32%

LEVEL 2

153

40%

LEVEL 3

74

19%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

135

34%

LEVEL 2

165

41%

LEVEL 3

78

19%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

49

24%

LEVEL 2

86

43%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

55

26%

LEVEL 2

87

41%

LEVEL 3

50

24%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

75

41%

LEVEL 2

67

37%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

80

42%

LEVEL 2

78

41%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

115

32%

LEVEL 2

140

39%

LEVEL 3

70

20%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

125

33%

LEVEL 2

155

41%

LEVEL 3

70

19%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

94

27%

LEVEL 2

150

43%

LEVEL 3

74

21%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

105

28%

LEVEL 2

162

44%

LEVEL 3

78

21%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

30

91%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

30

91%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

41

20%

LEVEL 2

80

39%

LEVEL 3

55

27%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

49

23%

LEVEL 2

88

41%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

83

46%

LEVEL 2

73

40%

LEVEL 3

19

10%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

86

46%

LEVEL 2

77

42%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.