500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MARTIN LUTHER KING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

272

61%

LEVEL 2

125

28%

LEVEL 3

45

10%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

34
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

326

67%

LEVEL 2

128

26%

LEVEL 3

32

7%

LEVEL 4

2

0%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

112

55%

LEVEL 2

64

31%

LEVEL 3

25

12%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

17
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

136

61%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

16

7%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

160

66%

LEVEL 2

61

25%

LEVEL 3

20

8%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

190

72%

LEVEL 2

57

22%

LEVEL 3

16

6%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

154

64%

LEVEL 2

62

26%

LEVEL 3

26

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

173

69%

LEVEL 2

63

25%

LEVEL 3

14

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

115

58%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

19

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

149

65%

LEVEL 2

62

27%

LEVEL 3

18

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

186

53%

LEVEL 2

117

34%

LEVEL 3

42

12%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

33
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

245

62%

LEVEL 2

119

30%

LEVEL 3

31

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

86

89%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

81

89%

LEVEL 2

9

10%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

47
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

215

57%

LEVEL 2

114

30%

LEVEL 3

43

11%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

30
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

260

65%

LEVEL 2

113

28%

LEVEL 3

28

7%

LEVEL 4

2

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

57

81%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

66

78%

LEVEL 2

15

18%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

16

55%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

264

62%

LEVEL 2

119

28%

LEVEL 3

41

10%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

310

68%

LEVEL 2

118

26%

LEVEL 3

29

6%

LEVEL 4

2

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.