500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MT SINAI MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

86

17%

LEVEL 2

184

37%

LEVEL 3

142

29%

LEVEL 4

85

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

47

15%

LEVEL 2

108

34%

LEVEL 3

97

31%

LEVEL 4

64

20%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

48

20%

LEVEL 2

89

37%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

19

13%

LEVEL 2

53

36%

LEVEL 3

51

34%

LEVEL 4

25

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

124
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

95

37%

LEVEL 3

76

30%

LEVEL 4

48

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

28

17%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

46

27%

LEVEL 4

39

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

6

16%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

14

37%

LEVEL 4

12

32%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

11

32%

LEVEL 4

13

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

186
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

72

17%

LEVEL 2

158

38%

LEVEL 3

119

29%

LEVEL 4

67

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

94

37%

LEVEL 3

79

31%

LEVEL 4

45

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

14

48%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

5

26%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

58

13%

LEVEL 2

168

38%

LEVEL 3

138

31%

LEVEL 4

83

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

102

35%

LEVEL 3

95

32%

LEVEL 4

62

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

28

56%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

12

55%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

219
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

78

17%

LEVEL 2

174

37%

LEVEL 3

136

29%

LEVEL 4

83

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

160
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

44

14%

LEVEL 2

107

34%

LEVEL 3

96

31%

LEVEL 4

64

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

8

31%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.