500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MT SINAI MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

202
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

53

13%

LEVEL 2

163

39%

LEVEL 3

154

37%

LEVEL 4

48

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

38

12%

LEVEL 2

128

42%

LEVEL 3

99

32%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

79

42%

LEVEL 3

78

41%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

17

11%

LEVEL 2

60

41%

LEVEL 3

50

34%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

41

18%

LEVEL 2

84

37%

LEVEL 3

76

33%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

68

43%

LEVEL 3

49

31%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

20

43%

LEVEL 4

10

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

16

39%

LEVEL 4

13

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

161
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

44

13%

LEVEL 2

136

40%

LEVEL 3

128

38%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

29

12%

LEVEL 2

110

46%

LEVEL 3

75

32%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

12

52%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

154

40%

LEVEL 3

151

39%

LEVEL 4

46

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

120

42%

LEVEL 3

99

35%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

16

53%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

12

60%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

202
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

51

12%

LEVEL 2

160

39%

LEVEL 3

154

37%

LEVEL 4

48

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

33

11%

LEVEL 2

121

42%

LEVEL 3

96

33%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.