500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SELDEN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

107

26%

LEVEL 2

142

35%

LEVEL 3

106

26%

LEVEL 4

50

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

36

20%

LEVEL 2

51

28%

LEVEL 3

57

32%

LEVEL 4

36

20%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

41

21%

LEVEL 2

65

33%

LEVEL 3

68

35%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

12

15%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

28

35%

LEVEL 4

20

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

66

32%

LEVEL 2

77

37%

LEVEL 3

38

18%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

24

24%

LEVEL 2

32

32%

LEVEL 3

29

29%

LEVEL 4

16

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

18

45%

LEVEL 4

12

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

13

43%

LEVEL 4

9

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

101
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

65

24%

LEVEL 2

103

38%

LEVEL 3

71

26%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

53
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

15

16%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

31

33%

LEVEL 4

22

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

31

44%

LEVEL 2

24

34%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

10

30%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

62

18%

LEVEL 2

126

37%

LEVEL 3

105

31%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

46

29%

LEVEL 3

56

35%

LEVEL 4

35

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

45

71%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

15

68%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

68

23%

LEVEL 2

109

36%

LEVEL 3

84

28%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

18

15%

LEVEL 2

29

25%

LEVEL 3

42

36%

LEVEL 4

29

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

39

37%

LEVEL 2

33

31%

LEVEL 3

22

21%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

18

29%

LEVEL 2

22

35%

LEVEL 3

15

24%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.