500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SELDEN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 708

LEVEL 1

223

31%

LEVEL 2

301

43%

LEVEL 3

143

20%

LEVEL 4

41

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

93

30%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

81

26%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

74

22%

LEVEL 2

151

45%

LEVEL 3

86

26%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

30

21%

LEVEL 2

44

31%

LEVEL 3

45

32%

LEVEL 4

21

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

149

40%

LEVEL 2

150

40%

LEVEL 3

57

15%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

63

37%

LEVEL 2

56

33%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

25

40%

LEVEL 3

24

38%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

15

36%

LEVEL 3

13

31%

LEVEL 4

10

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

148

30%

LEVEL 2

214

44%

LEVEL 3

102

21%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

67
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

47

29%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

17

47%

LEVEL 2

13

36%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

51

44%

LEVEL 2

46

40%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

23

37%

LEVEL 2

23

37%

LEVEL 3

15

24%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 606

LEVEL 1

143

24%

LEVEL 2

281

46%

LEVEL 3

141

23%

LEVEL 4

41

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

72

26%

LEVEL 2

88

32%

LEVEL 3

80

29%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

80

78%

LEVEL 2

20

20%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

21

62%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

144

28%

LEVEL 2

230

45%

LEVEL 3

110

21%

LEVEL 4

32

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

49

25%

LEVEL 2

66

33%

LEVEL 3

60

30%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

79

41%

LEVEL 2

71

37%

LEVEL 3

33

17%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

44

40%

LEVEL 2

34

31%

LEVEL 3

21

19%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.