500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

WILLIAM PACA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

209

42%

LEVEL 2

174

35%

LEVEL 3

84

17%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

92

35%

LEVEL 2

92

35%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

88

38%

LEVEL 2

82

36%

LEVEL 3

46

20%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

36

30%

LEVEL 2

43

36%

LEVEL 3

25

21%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

121

46%

LEVEL 2

92

35%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

56

39%

LEVEL 2

49

34%

LEVEL 3

25

17%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

73%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

89
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

103

35%

LEVEL 2

104

35%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

46
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

28

24%

LEVEL 2

44

37%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

19

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

59

60%

LEVEL 2

33

34%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

26

48%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

37

49%

LEVEL 2

27

36%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

33

47%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

14

20%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

149

35%

LEVEL 2

167

39%

LEVEL 3

84

20%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

63

28%

LEVEL 2

85

37%

LEVEL 3

50

22%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

60

90%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

29

81%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

112
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

202

42%

LEVEL 2

171

35%

LEVEL 3

84

17%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

74

32%

LEVEL 2

86

37%

LEVEL 3

59

25%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

23

22%

LEVEL 2

39

37%

LEVEL 3

27

26%

LEVEL 4

16

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

135

52%

LEVEL 2

88

34%

LEVEL 3

25

10%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

69

44%

LEVEL 2

53

34%

LEVEL 3

23

15%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.