500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SAWMILL INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

347
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 610

LEVEL 1

81

13%

LEVEL 2

182

30%

LEVEL 3

212

35%

LEVEL 4

135

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

53

19%

LEVEL 3

104

38%

LEVEL 4

80

29%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

174
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

33

11%

LEVEL 2

91

31%

LEVEL 3

117

39%

LEVEL 4

57

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

30

22%

LEVEL 3

52

39%

LEVEL 4

38

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

173
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

91

29%

LEVEL 3

95

30%

LEVEL 4

78

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

21

15%

LEVEL 2

23

17%

LEVEL 3

52

38%

LEVEL 4

42

30%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

12

57%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

42
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

18

32%

LEVEL 4

24

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

LEVEL 4

18

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

273
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

65

13%

LEVEL 2

148

30%

LEVEL 3

172

35%

LEVEL 4

101

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

31

17%

LEVEL 3

78

43%

LEVEL 4

52

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

10

26%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

327
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

29

6%

LEVEL 2

153

30%

LEVEL 3

196

39%

LEVEL 4

131

26%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

45

19%

LEVEL 3

96

41%

LEVEL 4

78

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

52

51%

LEVEL 2

29

29%

LEVEL 3

16

16%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

23

56%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

347
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 605

LEVEL 1

79

13%

LEVEL 2

179

30%

LEVEL 3

212

35%

LEVEL 4

135

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

328
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

73

13%

LEVEL 2

167

29%

LEVEL 3

203

36%

LEVEL 4

125

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

167
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

44

19%

LEVEL 3

96

41%

LEVEL 4

71

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

8

19%

LEVEL 2

15

36%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

10

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

9

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.