500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SAWMILL INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 629

LEVEL 1

143

23%

LEVEL 2

234

37%

LEVEL 3

206

33%

LEVEL 4

46

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

61

20%

LEVEL 2

118

38%

LEVEL 3

93

30%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

155
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

111

36%

LEVEL 3

123

40%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

25

16%

LEVEL 2

55

35%

LEVEL 3

49

31%

LEVEL 4

29

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

98

31%

LEVEL 2

123

39%

LEVEL 3

83

26%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

36

24%

LEVEL 2

63

42%

LEVEL 3

44

30%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

10

48%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

9

64%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

35
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

22

40%

LEVEL 4

13

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

12

25%

LEVEL 3

16

33%

LEVEL 4

13

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

192
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

118

23%

LEVEL 2

196

39%

LEVEL 3

161

32%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

84
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

40

19%

LEVEL 2

83

40%

LEVEL 3

64

31%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

15

39%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

13

34%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

8

28%

LEVEL 2

13

45%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

72

14%

LEVEL 2

210

40%

LEVEL 3

194

37%

LEVEL 4

45

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

103

40%

LEVEL 3

89

34%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

71

66%

LEVEL 2

24

22%

LEVEL 3

12

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

28

60%

LEVEL 2

15

32%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

234
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 583

LEVEL 1

129

22%

LEVEL 2

220

38%

LEVEL 3

190

33%

LEVEL 4

44

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

44

17%

LEVEL 2

98

38%

LEVEL 3

83

32%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

14

30%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

16

35%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

17

35%

LEVEL 2

20

41%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.