500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

COMMACK MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

50

14%

LEVEL 2

103

29%

LEVEL 3

131

37%

LEVEL 4

72

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

32

10%

LEVEL 2

68

21%

LEVEL 3

113

36%

LEVEL 4

104

33%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

67

39%

LEVEL 4

27

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

41

30%

LEVEL 3

45

33%

LEVEL 4

39

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

29

16%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

64

35%

LEVEL 4

45

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

133
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

27

15%

LEVEL 3

68

38%

LEVEL 4

65

36%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

46
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

24

41%

LEVEL 4

22

37%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

62
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

25

34%

LEVEL 4

37

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

125
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

33

14%

LEVEL 2

74

32%

LEVEL 3

88

38%

LEVEL 4

37

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

129
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

49

25%

LEVEL 3

74

38%

LEVEL 4

55

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

14

36%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

8

26%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

8

26%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

25

8%

LEVEL 2

90

29%

LEVEL 3

125

40%

LEVEL 4

72

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

61

21%

LEVEL 3

109

37%

LEVEL 4

103

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

25

57%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

13

52%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

212
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

31

10%

LEVEL 2

66

21%

LEVEL 3

109

35%

LEVEL 4

103

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

42

14%

LEVEL 2

88

28%

LEVEL 3

116

38%

LEVEL 4

63

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

192
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

56

21%

LEVEL 3

100

37%

LEVEL 4

92

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

8

17%

LEVEL 2

15

32%

LEVEL 3

15

32%

LEVEL 4

9

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

7

16%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

12

27%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.