500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SAYVILLE UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

118

36%

LEVEL 3

120

36%

LEVEL 4

63

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

83

30%

LEVEL 3

111

40%

LEVEL 4

63

23%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

55

37%

LEVEL 4

26

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

39

28%

LEVEL 3

54

39%

LEVEL 4

34

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

64

35%

LEVEL 3

65

36%

LEVEL 4

37

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

44

31%

LEVEL 3

57

40%

LEVEL 4

29

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

7

41%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

6

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

96

36%

LEVEL 3

101

38%

LEVEL 4

48

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

139
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

58

27%

LEVEL 3

90

42%

LEVEL 4

49

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

13

50%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

15

48%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

99

34%

LEVEL 3

119

41%

LEVEL 4

62

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

70

27%

LEVEL 3

108

42%

LEVEL 4

62

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

18

46%

LEVEL 2

19

49%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

8

32%

LEVEL 2

13

52%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

171
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

105

35%

LEVEL 3

112

38%

LEVEL 4

59

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

75

30%

LEVEL 3

103

41%

LEVEL 4

60

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

7

22%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

7

27%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.