500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SAYVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 742

LEVEL 1

119

16%

LEVEL 2

335

45%

LEVEL 3

203

27%

LEVEL 4

85

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

88

17%

LEVEL 2

214

41%

LEVEL 3

147

28%

LEVEL 4

68

13%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

134
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

52

15%

LEVEL 2

164

47%

LEVEL 3

95

27%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

33

14%

LEVEL 2

96

41%

LEVEL 3

76

33%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

154
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

67

17%

LEVEL 2

171

44%

LEVEL 3

108

28%

LEVEL 4

46

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

55

19%

LEVEL 2

118

42%

LEVEL 3

71

25%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

271
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 691

LEVEL 1

106

15%

LEVEL 2

314

45%

LEVEL 3

191

28%

LEVEL 4

80

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

195
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

79

17%

LEVEL 2

199

42%

LEVEL 3

134

28%

LEVEL 4

61

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

7

22%

LEVEL 2

15

47%

LEVEL 3

7

22%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

6

23%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

285
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 642

LEVEL 1

54

8%

LEVEL 2

303

47%

LEVEL 3

200

31%

LEVEL 4

85

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

46

10%

LEVEL 2

183

41%

LEVEL 3

145

33%

LEVEL 4

67

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

65

65%

LEVEL 2

32

32%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

42

55%

LEVEL 2

31

41%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

273
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 671

LEVEL 1

95

14%

LEVEL 2

303

45%

LEVEL 3

189

28%

LEVEL 4

84

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

206
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

72

15%

LEVEL 2

192

41%

LEVEL 3

138

29%

LEVEL 4

68

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

24

34%

LEVEL 2

32

45%

LEVEL 3

14

20%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

16

34%

LEVEL 2

22

47%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.