500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SAYVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

354
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 749

LEVEL 1

98

13%

LEVEL 2

297

40%

LEVEL 3

231

31%

LEVEL 4

123

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

242
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 643

LEVEL 1

123

19%

LEVEL 2

278

43%

LEVEL 3

185

29%

LEVEL 4

57

9%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

196
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

124

35%

LEVEL 3

130

37%

LEVEL 4

66

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

142
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

31

10%

LEVEL 2

128

43%

LEVEL 3

105

35%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

158
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

63

16%

LEVEL 2

173

44%

LEVEL 3

101

26%

LEVEL 4

57

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

92

27%

LEVEL 2

150

44%

LEVEL 3

80

23%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

335
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 698

LEVEL 1

88

13%

LEVEL 2

275

39%

LEVEL 3

218

31%

LEVEL 4

117

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

220
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 594

LEVEL 1

114

19%

LEVEL 2

260

44%

LEVEL 3

169

28%

LEVEL 4

51

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

16

50%

LEVEL 3

7

22%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

8

29%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

350
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 648

LEVEL 1

40

6%

LEVEL 2

258

40%

LEVEL 3

227

35%

LEVEL 4

123

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

70

13%

LEVEL 2

247

44%

LEVEL 3

182

33%

LEVEL 4

57

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

58

57%

LEVEL 2

39

39%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

53

61%

LEVEL 2

31

36%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

333
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 677

LEVEL 1

78

12%

LEVEL 2

266

39%

LEVEL 3

213

31%

LEVEL 4

120

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

236
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 586

LEVEL 1

103

18%

LEVEL 2

247

42%

LEVEL 3

179

31%

LEVEL 4

57

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

20

28%

LEVEL 2

31

43%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

20

35%

LEVEL 2

31

54%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.