500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

LAUREL PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

147

44%

LEVEL 2

121

36%

LEVEL 3

52

16%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

66

33%

LEVEL 2

77

39%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

55

39%

LEVEL 2

57

41%

LEVEL 3

23

16%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

22
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

19

25%

LEVEL 2

36

47%

LEVEL 3

20

26%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

92

48%

LEVEL 2

64

33%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

47

39%

LEVEL 2

41

34%

LEVEL 3

25

21%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

11

38%

LEVEL 2

13

45%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

10

59%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

131

45%

LEVEL 2

100

34%

LEVEL 3

47

16%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

48
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

62

35%

LEVEL 2

66

38%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

101

38%

LEVEL 2

103

39%

LEVEL 3

47

18%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

39

25%

LEVEL 2

69

44%

LEVEL 3

38

24%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

46

66%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

27

64%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

55
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

50

29%

LEVEL 2

67

39%

LEVEL 3

44

26%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

47
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

16

14%

LEVEL 2

52

45%

LEVEL 3

37

32%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

97

60%

LEVEL 2

54

34%

LEVEL 3

8

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

50

60%

LEVEL 2

25

30%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

11

46%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

136

44%

LEVEL 2

112

36%

LEVEL 3

49

16%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

63

34%

LEVEL 2

73

39%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.