500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

FRANCIS J O'NEILL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

108

29%

LEVEL 2

130

35%

LEVEL 3

99

27%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

136

32%

LEVEL 2

154

37%

LEVEL 3

89

21%

LEVEL 4

42

10%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

55

30%

LEVEL 2

62

34%

LEVEL 3

54

30%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

60

28%

LEVEL 2

80

38%

LEVEL 3

49

23%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

53

28%

LEVEL 2

68

36%

LEVEL 3

45

24%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

76

36%

LEVEL 2

74

35%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

15
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

14
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

11

33%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

32

49%

LEVEL 2

18

28%

LEVEL 3

13

20%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

24

41%

LEVEL 2

21

36%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

98
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

68

26%

LEVEL 2

97

37%

LEVEL 3

74

28%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

96
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

99

31%

LEVEL 2

123

39%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

87

26%

LEVEL 2

121

36%

LEVEL 3

96

28%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

96

26%

LEVEL 2

145

40%

LEVEL 3

84

23%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

21

60%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

40

73%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

119
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

86

28%

LEVEL 2

106

34%

LEVEL 3

86

28%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

123
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

81

25%

LEVEL 2

125

38%

LEVEL 3

82

25%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

15
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

22

36%

LEVEL 2

24

39%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

55

60%

LEVEL 2

29

32%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

9

18%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

16

31%

LEVEL 4

11

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

25

32%

LEVEL 2

29

37%

LEVEL 3

13

16%

LEVEL 4

12

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

99

31%

LEVEL 2

115

36%

LEVEL 3

83

26%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

111

32%

LEVEL 2

125

37%

LEVEL 3

76

22%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.