500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PULASKI STREET ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 648

LEVEL 1

242

37%

LEVEL 2

220

34%

LEVEL 3

133

21%

LEVEL 4

53

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

206

45%

LEVEL 2

136

30%

LEVEL 3

83

18%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

124

35%

LEVEL 2

119

34%

LEVEL 3

80

23%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

84

39%

LEVEL 2

75

35%

LEVEL 3

43

20%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

118

40%

LEVEL 2

101

34%

LEVEL 3

53

18%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

122

51%

LEVEL 2

61

25%

LEVEL 3

40

17%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

66

20%

LEVEL 2

129

39%

LEVEL 3

97

29%

LEVEL 4

40

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

71
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

35

21%

LEVEL 2

62

37%

LEVEL 3

46

27%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

69

66%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

42

66%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

95

50%

LEVEL 2

64

34%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

124

59%

LEVEL 2

55

26%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

167

30%

LEVEL 2

210

38%

LEVEL 3

132

24%

LEVEL 4

51

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

147

38%

LEVEL 2

129

33%

LEVEL 3

81

21%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

75

85%

LEVEL 2

10

11%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

59

87%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

185
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

168

30%

LEVEL 2

211

37%

LEVEL 3

132

23%

LEVEL 4

53

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

113
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

119

33%

LEVEL 2

128

36%

LEVEL 3

82

23%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

74

88%

LEVEL 2

9

11%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

87

91%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

66

20%

LEVEL 2

128

39%

LEVEL 3

96

29%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

38

21%

LEVEL 2

64

36%

LEVEL 3

52

29%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

176

55%

LEVEL 2

92

29%

LEVEL 3

37

12%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

168

60%

LEVEL 2

72

26%

LEVEL 3

31

11%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

186
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 643

LEVEL 1

239

37%

LEVEL 2

218

34%

LEVEL 3

133

21%

LEVEL 4

53

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.