500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

WILLIAM T ROGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

399
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 870

LEVEL 1

131

15%

LEVEL 2

340

39%

LEVEL 3

264

30%

LEVEL 4

135

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

58

13%

LEVEL 2

145

33%

LEVEL 3

147

34%

LEVEL 4

85

20%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

217
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

48

11%

LEVEL 2

164

38%

LEVEL 3

132

31%

LEVEL 4

85

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

66

32%

LEVEL 3

76

37%

LEVEL 4

49

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

182
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

83

19%

LEVEL 2

176

40%

LEVEL 3

132

30%

LEVEL 4

50

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

42

18%

LEVEL 2

79

35%

LEVEL 3

71

31%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

9

31%

LEVEL 4

9

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

373
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 810

LEVEL 1

120

15%

LEVEL 2

317

39%

LEVEL 3

251

31%

LEVEL 4

122

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

208
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

46

12%

LEVEL 2

125

33%

LEVEL 3

135

36%

LEVEL 4

73

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

10

36%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

389
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 724

LEVEL 1

52

7%

LEVEL 2

283

39%

LEVEL 3

255

35%

LEVEL 4

134

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

229
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

133

34%

LEVEL 3

146

38%

LEVEL 4

83

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

79

54%

LEVEL 2

57

39%

LEVEL 3

9

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

33

69%

LEVEL 2

12

25%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

382
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 830

LEVEL 1

123

15%

LEVEL 2

325

39%

LEVEL 3

250

30%

LEVEL 4

132

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

222
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

45

11%

LEVEL 2

136

34%

LEVEL 3

143

35%

LEVEL 4

79

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

8

20%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

14

35%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

13

41%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.