500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

OWEGO-APALACHIN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

172

34%

LEVEL 2

208

41%

LEVEL 3

96

19%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

165

38%

LEVEL 2

174

40%

LEVEL 3

64

15%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

84

35%

LEVEL 2

96

40%

LEVEL 3

47

20%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

82

38%

LEVEL 2

88

41%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

88

33%

LEVEL 2

112

42%

LEVEL 3

49

18%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

83

39%

LEVEL 2

86

40%

LEVEL 3

31

14%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

120
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

160

34%

LEVEL 2

195

41%

LEVEL 3

90

19%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

157

38%

LEVEL 2

165

40%

LEVEL 3

59

14%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

109

26%

LEVEL 2

187

45%

LEVEL 3

92

22%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

94

27%

LEVEL 2

164

47%

LEVEL 3

63

18%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

63

72%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

71

87%

LEVEL 2

10

12%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

73

27%

LEVEL 2

111

41%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

69

30%

LEVEL 2

102

44%

LEVEL 3

40

17%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

99

43%

LEVEL 2

97

42%

LEVEL 3

33

14%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

96

48%

LEVEL 2

72

36%

LEVEL 3

24

12%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.