500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

OWEGO-APALACHIN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

266
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 737

LEVEL 1

198

27%

LEVEL 2

273

37%

LEVEL 3

186

25%

LEVEL 4

80

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

314
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 736

LEVEL 1

183

25%

LEVEL 2

239

32%

LEVEL 3

189

26%

LEVEL 4

125

17%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

88

25%

LEVEL 2

141

39%

LEVEL 3

95

27%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

85

24%

LEVEL 2

126

36%

LEVEL 3

87

25%

LEVEL 4

54

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

138
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

110

29%

LEVEL 2

132

35%

LEVEL 3

91

24%

LEVEL 4

47

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

173
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

98

26%

LEVEL 2

113

29%

LEVEL 3

102

27%

LEVEL 4

71

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

257
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 695

LEVEL 1

179

26%

LEVEL 2

259

37%

LEVEL 3

179

26%

LEVEL 4

78

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

298
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 690

LEVEL 1

165

24%

LEVEL 2

227

33%

LEVEL 3

176

26%

LEVEL 4

122

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

8

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

9

64%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

251
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 605

LEVEL 1

117

19%

LEVEL 2

237

39%

LEVEL 3

172

28%

LEVEL 4

79

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

294
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 621

LEVEL 1

113

18%

LEVEL 2

214

34%

LEVEL 3

175

28%

LEVEL 4

119

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

81

61%

LEVEL 2

36

27%

LEVEL 3

14

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

70

61%

LEVEL 2

25

22%

LEVEL 3

14

12%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

173
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

64

17%

LEVEL 2

138

37%

LEVEL 3

114

30%

LEVEL 4

59

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

211
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

65

16%

LEVEL 2

129

32%

LEVEL 3

116

29%

LEVEL 4

95

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

134

37%

LEVEL 2

135

37%

LEVEL 3

72

20%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

118

36%

LEVEL 2

110

33%

LEVEL 3

73

22%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.