500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SAUGERTIES JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

191

45%

LEVEL 2

166

39%

LEVEL 3

49

12%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

110

37%

LEVEL 2

120

41%

LEVEL 3

45

15%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

101

48%

LEVEL 2

78

37%

LEVEL 3

20

10%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

56

40%

LEVEL 2

52

37%

LEVEL 3

20

14%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

90

42%

LEVEL 2

88

42%

LEVEL 3

29

14%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

54

35%

LEVEL 2

68

44%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

58
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

162

44%

LEVEL 2

149

40%

LEVEL 3

44

12%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

58
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

95

37%

LEVEL 2

107

41%

LEVEL 3

41

16%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

14

52%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

10

45%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

130

38%

LEVEL 2

152

44%

LEVEL 3

49

14%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

69

29%

LEVEL 2

110

46%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

61

81%

LEVEL 2

14

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

41

77%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

89

36%

LEVEL 2

113

45%

LEVEL 3

35

14%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

47

28%

LEVEL 2

71

43%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

102

60%

LEVEL 2

53

31%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

63

50%

LEVEL 2

49

39%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.