500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

LAKE GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

81

31%

LEVEL 2

118

45%

LEVEL 3

47

18%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

46

17%

LEVEL 2

93

35%

LEVEL 3

86

32%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

43

34%

LEVEL 2

52

41%

LEVEL 3

23

18%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

26

20%

LEVEL 2

44

33%

LEVEL 3

37

28%

LEVEL 4

25

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

38

27%

LEVEL 2

66

47%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

49

36%

LEVEL 3

49

36%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

72

29%

LEVEL 2

115

46%

LEVEL 3

44

18%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

41

17%

LEVEL 2

84

34%

LEVEL 3

83

33%

LEVEL 4

40

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

58

25%

LEVEL 2

113

48%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

30

13%

LEVEL 2

80

34%

LEVEL 3

84

35%

LEVEL 4

43

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

23

74%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

16

52%

LEVEL 2

13

42%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

48

23%

LEVEL 2

100

49%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

67

33%

LEVEL 3

72

36%

LEVEL 4

37

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

33

56%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

20

30%

LEVEL 2

26

39%

LEVEL 3

14

21%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.