500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

WILLIAM H BARTON INTERMEDIATE SCH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

103

20%

LEVEL 2

207

40%

LEVEL 3

145

28%

LEVEL 4

63

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

134

26%

LEVEL 2

177

35%

LEVEL 3

137

27%

LEVEL 4

62

12%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

120
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

37

15%

LEVEL 2

89

36%

LEVEL 3

86

35%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

52

22%

LEVEL 2

86

36%

LEVEL 3

68

29%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

66

24%

LEVEL 2

118

43%

LEVEL 3

59

22%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

82

30%

LEVEL 2

91

33%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

201
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

93

19%

LEVEL 2

199

40%

LEVEL 3

140

28%

LEVEL 4

61

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

186
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

123

26%

LEVEL 2

165

35%

LEVEL 3

128

27%

LEVEL 4

58

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

64

14%

LEVEL 2

190

41%

LEVEL 3

144

31%

LEVEL 4

63

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

86

19%

LEVEL 2

163

37%

LEVEL 3

137

31%

LEVEL 4

60

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

39

68%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

48

75%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

192
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

64

15%

LEVEL 2

161

39%

LEVEL 3

133

32%

LEVEL 4

59

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

170
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

70

19%

LEVEL 2

131

35%

LEVEL 3

115

31%

LEVEL 4

55

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

39

39%

LEVEL 2

46

46%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

64

46%

LEVEL 2

46

33%

LEVEL 3

22

16%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.